Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PATRICK DUANE WALKER, Case No. 1:25-cv-01513-SKO Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER v. (Doc. 1) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Patrick Duane Walker is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. (Docs. 2, 3.) Upon reviewing his complaint, the undersigned concludes that it fails to state any cognizable claims. Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed. He may file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a statement with the Court stating that he wants to stand on this complaint and have it reviewed by the presiding district judge, in which case the undersigned will issue findings and recommendations to the district judge consistent with this order. If Plaintiff does not file anything, the undersigned will recommend that the case be dismissed. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT …