Suazo

Troy Lamar Nevels v. B. Suazo, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20251:25-cv-01688California752 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TROY LAMAR NEVELS, No. 1:25-cv-01688-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 B. SUAZO, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

15 Defendants. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE

DENIED

16 (ECF No. 2) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Plaintiff filed the instant action on December 1, 2025, along with a motion to proceed in 20 forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) 21 I. 22 DISCUSSION 23 A. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 24 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) permits a plaintiff to bring a civil action “without prepayment of 25 fees or security thereof” if the plaintiff submits a financial affidavit that demonstrates the plaintiff's 26 “is unable to pay such fees or give security…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.