Barry Stuart Halajian v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BARRY STUART HALAJIAN, No. 2:23-cv-01522-DJC-SCR 12 Plaintiff,
13 v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
14 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16
17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant 19 to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff attempts to challenge Defendants’ 20 actions with respect to a Connecticut state court legal proceeding that he has since settled. On 21 July 28, 2025, Judge Calabretta entered an Order (ECF No. 83) adopting the undersigned’s 22 Findings and Recommendations and granting three motions to dismiss. (ECF No. 43, 45 & 51). 23 That order dismissed all claims and all defendants except Defendant Bay Advance. ECF No. 83 24 at 2. The Court now recommends that the sole remaining defendant be dismissed and judgment 25 entered. 26 //// 27 //// 28 1 I. Procedural History and Background 2 Plaintiff Barry Stuart Halajian filed this action on July 25, 2023. ECF No. 1. The 3 complaint named as…