Benividaz

Paul Lewis v. Benividaz, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20252:24-cv-02382California3,609 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL LEWIS, No. 2:24-cv-2382 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BENIVIDAZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without a lawyer and has paid the filing fee. Pending before the court is screening of plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) and a request for status. ECF Nos. 6, 8. I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints A. Legal Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against “a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). A claim “is [legally] frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). The court may dismiss a claim as frivolous if it is based on an indisputably meritless legal theory or factual contentions that are baseless. Id. at 327. The 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.