Covelo

Melvin Jaman Peete v. Patrick Covelo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20252:24-cv-03440California3,912 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN JAMAN PEETE, No. 2:24-cv-03440 WBS SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 PATRICK COVELO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is incarcerated in state prison and proceeding pro se with a civil rights action 18 under to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the undersigned is plaintiff’s complaint for screening under 28 19 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 1.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned finds that the 20 complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. Plaintiff will be given an opportunity to file an 21 amended complaint. 22 IN FORMA PAUPERIS 23 Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this action, 24 under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) He has submitted a declaration showing that he cannot 25 afford to pay the entire filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to 26 proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This means that plaintiff is allowed to pay the $350.00 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.