Alberto Fernando Manfredi, et al. v. Lakeland Village Owners Association, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALBERTO FERNANDO MANFREDI, et Case No. 2:25-cv-01294-DJC-CSK al., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR RECONSIDERATION 13 v. (ECF No. 43)
LAKELAND VILLAGE OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Alberto Fernando Manfredi and Melissa Leigh Manfredi’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s August 27, 2025 Order denying Plaintiffs’ motion for e-filing access.1 (ECF No. 43.) For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration is DENIED. A court may properly reconsider its decision if it (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law. Smith v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 727 F.3d 950, 955 (9th Cir. 2013). The choice to reconsider an order is left to the discretion of the court. See id. “A party seeking…