USCIS
Tatiana Iampolskaia, et al. v. USCIS, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TATIANA IAMPOLSKAIA, et al.,
12 Plaintiffs, No. 2:25-cv-01789-TLN-CKD
13 14 v. ORDER USCIS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Tatiana Iampolskaia’s (“Plaintiff”) Emergency 20 Motion to Stay.1 (ECF No. 16.) Defendants United States Citizenship and Immigration Services 21 (“USCIS”), Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Merrick Garland2 (collectively, 22 “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 20.) For the 23 reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.
24 1 Based on the substance of Plaintiff’s brief and the relief requested therein, the Court construes Plaintiff’s pleading as a motion for a temporary restraining order. Estelle v. Gamble, 25 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976) (stating that pleadings by pro se litigants must be held to less stringent 26 standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.)
27 2 Pamela Bondi has succeeded Merrick Garland as United States Attorney General,…