Danny Joe Dodson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20251:23-cv-01298California1,135 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANNY JOE DODSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-01298-JLT-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

13 v. FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND (ECF No. 13) 15 REHABILITATION, et al.,

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 Defendants. 17 18 I. Background 19 Plaintiff Danny Joe Dodson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 20 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United 21 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On October 16, 2025, the Court screened the complaint and directed Plaintiff to either file 23 a first amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed on the cognizable 24 claim identified by the Court. (ECF No. 13.) The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that his 25 failure to comply with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.