MaComber
Patrick A. Cannavan v. Jeff Macomber, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICK A. CANNAVAN, No. 1:25-cv-01480-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 JEFF MACOMBER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
15 Defendants. FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE DENIED 16 (ECF No. 9) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a court order to stop interference with 21 his ability to litigation this action, filed November 28, 2025. 22 I. 23
LEGAL STANDARD
24 The primary purpose of a preliminary injunction is preservation of the status quo. See, 25 e.g., Ramos v. Wolf, 975 F.3d 872, 887 (9th Cir. 2020). More specifically, the purpose of a 26 preliminary injunction is preservation of the Court’s power to render a meaningful decision after 27 a trial on the…