MaComber
Patrick A. Cannavan v. Jeff Macomber, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK A. CANNAVAN, No. 1:25-cv-01480-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
v. TO THIS ACTION JEFF MACOMBER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
Defendants. FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE DENIED (ECF No. 9) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a court order to stop interference with 21 his ability to litigation this action, filed November 28, 2025. 22 I.
LEGAL STANDARD
24 The primary purpose of a preliminary injunction is preservation of the status quo. See, 25 e.g., Ramos v. Wolf, 975 F.3d 872, 887 (9th Cir. 2020). More specifically, the purpose of a 26 preliminary injunction is preservation of the Court’s power to render a meaningful decision after 27 a trial on the…