Mencias

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISAIAH GARONE, No. 2:22-cv-2310 DAD CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 GLADYS MENCIAS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On October 24, 2025, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal 18 Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. 19 Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 20 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 21 the granting of the motion . . . .” Local Rule 230(l). On October 24, 2025, plaintiff was advised 22 of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion 23 may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 35 at 2 (citing Rand v. Rowland, 24 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc)).) 25 Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: 26 Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply…