Eugene Leon Price v. D. Noone, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EUGENE LEON PRICE, Case No. 2:24-cv-2756-JDP (P) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 D. NOONE, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff brings this action against numerous defendants; from the operative complaint I 19 cannot tell how many. As with his previous complaints, the operative complaint’s failure to 20 allege concise, intelligible claims against a determinate number of named defendants precludes a 21 finding that this action should proceed. Additionally, plaintiff again invokes allegations that 22 appear fanciful, insofar as they allege the use of a “low frequency sound” to harass him. ECF No. 23 27 at 25. Plaintiff has had ample opportunities to amend, and he is no closer to stating a 24 cognizable claim. Accordingly, I will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to state 25 a cognizable claim. 26 I. Screening and Pleading Requirements 27 A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that…