Savell

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 | ERIC J. SAVELL, Case No. 2:24-cv-01981-JAM-CSK 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED 1 y STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF No. 16) 12 | DOREL HOME FURNISHINGS, INC., 13 Defendant. 14 15 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 16 | 16), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See 17 || L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following 18 || clarification. 19 The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 20 | jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” 21 | L.R. 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, 22 | at*2 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain 23 | jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case).…