Anzar

Ray Medina v. Anzar, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20252:25-cv-00475California1,481 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAY MEDINA, No. 2:25-cv-0475 DC AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ANZAR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 18 without a lawyer. On November 5, 2025, the undersigned screened the First Amended Complaint 19 (“FAC”) and gave plaintiff twenty-one days to inform the court whether he wants to (1) proceed 20 immediately on his Eighth Amendment excessive force, failure to protect, sexual assault, and 21 medical deliberate indifference claims against defendants Anzar, Mendoza, Andrews, and 22 Stewart, and his First Amendment retaliation claims against defendants Andrews, Stewart, and 23 Singh, as set forth in Section I.D. of that order, or (2) file an amended complaint. ECF No. 17 at 24 8, 11. The undersigned also denied plaintiff’s motion to disqualify her. Id. at 11. Plaintiff has 25 filed a reply. ECF No. 20. 26 I. Notice of Election 27 In his reply,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.