Latoya R. Finley-Carminer v. Sacramento County Sheriff, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LATOYA R. FINLEY-CARMINER, No. 2:25-cv-2789 DAD CSK P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 Petitioner is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 10, 2025, this Court ordered petitioner to show cause, within fourteen days, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Fourteen days have passed, and petitioner failed to respond or otherwise show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Accordingly, this Court recommends that this action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. I. PETITIONER’S ALLEGATIONS In her petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, petitioner challenges a pending arrest warrant issued in Sacramento County,…