Pheiffer
Michael Manjeet Singh v. Pheiffer, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 8 9 MICHAEL MANJEET SINGH, Case No. 1:22-cv-01412-KES-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER OVERRULING IN PART
DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS TO
11 v. PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS BASED
ON THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION
12 PHEIFFER, et al., PRIVILEGE 13 Defendants. (ECF No. 88) 14 15 Plaintiff Michael Manjeet Singh is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the 17 complaint commencing this action on May 27, 2022. (ECF No. 9).1 This case proceeds on 18 Plaintiff claims against: (1) Defendants Veith and Fowler for excessive force in violation of the 19 Eighth Amendment; (2) Defendants Veith, Fowler, and Diaz for deliberate indifference to a 20 serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and (3) Defendants Veith, Fowler, 21 and Diaz for state law claims of negligent failure to protect and failure to summon medical care. 22 Now before the Court is Defendants’ Notice of Lodging of Documents for In Camera 23…