Jones

Thomas K. Mills v. Zachary Jones, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20251:25-cv-00355California2,091 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS K. MILLS, Case No.: 1:25-cv-00355-KES-CDB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT

13 v. PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S

FAILURE TO OBEY LOCAL RULES

14 ZACHARY JONES, et al., AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

15 Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE

16

17 Plaintiff Thomas K. Mills is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. section 1983. 19 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND 20 On September 25, 2025, previously assigned Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin issued his 21 Order Directing Parties to Inform Court Whether They Wish to Participate in Court’s Early 22 Alternative Dispute Resolution Program; Parties’ Notice Regarding Same Due in Seven Days. 23 (Doc. 36.) The order was served on Plaintiff at his address on record that same date. 24 On September 26, 2025, Defendants Jones and Rivera filed their Notice of Interest in 25 Early ADR Program. (Doc. 37.) That same date, Judge Austin issued…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.