Jiminian

Angel Jiminian, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Services, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20251:25-cv-00885California1,439 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 ANGEL JIMINIAN, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-00885-JLT-SKO

11 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO

12 COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S v. ORDERS AND FAILURE TO 13 PROSECUTE

14 PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES, et al., (Doc. 8)

15 Defendants. TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

16 _____________________________________/ 17 Plaintiffs Angel Jiminian and Mercedes Jiminian are proceeding pro se in this action that 18 was removed from Fresno County Superior Court by Defendants PHH Mortgage Services and 19 NewRez LLC (collectively “Defendants”) on July 21, 2025. (Doc. 1.) 20 On October 14, 2025, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. 3). Although Plaintiffs’ 21 response to the motion to dismiss was due on October 31, 2025, no response or opposition was filed. 22 (See Docket). On November 4, 2025, the undersigned issued an order requiring Plaintiffs to show 23 cause (“OSC”) within twenty-one days why the action should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.