Randy Ausborn v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 RANDY AUSBORN, Case No. 1:25-cv-01300-SKO

10 Plaintiff, O PR R O D T E E R C D T E IV N E Y I O N R G D M ER O TION FOR 11 v. (Doc. 11) 12 13 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 14 Defendants. 15

16 17 Plaintiff Randy Ausborn is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. (Docs. 18 8, 10.) Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, (see Doc. 10), and on November 6, 19 2025, Plaintiff filed what was docketed as a “Motion for a Protective Order” (the “motion”). (Doc. 20 11.) While some of the motion is illegible, the Court understands Plaintiff to be making the 21 following request: “I ask this from the Court to get me a body cam and a protective order be on 22 CDCR.” (Id. at 2.) 23 Starting with Plaintiff’s request for a “body cam,” the Court finds that Plaintiff has identified 24 no authority that would authorize this Court to grant his request. Therefore, the Court cannot grant 25 Plaintiff’s request for a “body cam.” 26 Turning to Plaintiff’s…