Doe

Israel Maldonado Ramirez v. Doe, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20251:25-cv-01379California1,296 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:25-cv-01379-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO PROCEED WITH LAWSUIT

13 v. (ECF No. 5)

14 DOE, et al., ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

15 Defendants. ACTION

16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

17 FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

18 (ECF No. 3) 19 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 20 21 I. Background 22 Plaintiff Israel Maldonado Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se 23 in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 24 On October 17, 2025, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to submit a completed 25 application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $405.00 filing fee to proceed with this action. 26 (ECF No. 3.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.