Frauenheim

Paul Moore v. Scott Frauenheim

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20252:18-cv-01699California11,857 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL MOORE, Case No. 2:18-cv-1699-DC-JDP (P) Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Respondent. 16 Paul Moore (“petitioner”) seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 2?. He was convicted of first-degree murder. Id. at 3. His conviction was affirmed by the state appellate court in November 2016 and the California Supreme Court denied his petition for review in March 2017. Id. He filed this petition on June 8, 2018. Alongside this petition, petitioner filed a state habeas petition in the Colusa County Superior Court on June 4, 2018. That petition was denied, after two evidentiary hearings, on August 19, 2022. ECF No. 50 at 9-10. Subsequent state habeas petitions in the state appellate court and California Supreme Court were also denied. Id. at 10. In the immediate petition, petitioner argues that he is entitled to habeas relief because: (1) his trial and appellate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.