Adams
Derrick Adams, et al. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DERRICK ADAMS, et al., No. 2:23-cv-01773-DJC-JDP 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
15 INC., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second 19 Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated the Sherman Antitrust 20 Act, the California Cartwright Act, and engaged in tortious interference with existing 21 contracts under California and New Jersey law. Defendants move to dismiss on the 22 grounds that Plaintiffs failed to allege antitrust standing and failed to plausibly allege 23 facts supporting their tortious interference with contracts claims. For the reasons 24 discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants’ 25 Motion to Dismiss. 26 BACKGROUND 27 The facts and procedural history are largely known to the Parties. However, 28 Plaintiffs have altered the Second Amended Complaint in a few ways. First, Plaintiffs 1 add AmeriFinancial…