Ricky Jay McCloud v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20252:24-cv-00687California1,338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICKY JAY McCLOUD, Case No. 2:24-cv-0687-DAD-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CASTILLO, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner,1 brought this case alleging that defendant Castillo violated his due process rights by placing him in disciplinary segregation without a procedurally adequate disciplinary hearing. ECF No. 7 at 4-6. Defendant Castillo has moved to dismiss the complaint, ECF No. 18, and plaintiff has filed an opposition, ECF No. 28. Defendant has declined to file a reply. After review of the pleadings, I find that defendant’s motion should be granted. 23 24

1 It was unclear from the complaint whether plaintiff was a pretrial detainee or a state 26 prisoner, since the events giving rise to this litigation occurred in the Justice Center Detention Facility in Fairfield, California, rather than in any state prison. This was a factor in allowing the claims to proceed past screening. Now, there does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.