Woodford

Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Darlene Woodford, Rebecca Loftis, Kennith Bullis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20252:24-cv-02809California3,219 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE No. 2:24-cv-2809 DJC AC

COMPANY,

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.

DARLENE WOODFORD, REBECCA

LOFTIS, KENNITH BULLIS, Defendants. 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. ECF No. 11. The motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(19). The motion was taken under submission on the papers. ECF No. 12. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends plaintiff’s motion be DENIED. I. Relevant Background Plaintiff filed this complaint seeking declaratory relief on October 11, 2024, asserting jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332. ECF No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff Progressive Direct Insurance Company (“Progressive”) is an insurance company seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify in relation to an underlying state court action. Id. On July 19, 2024, underlying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.