Adam Jacobs v. County of Sacramento, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20252:25-cv-02648California950 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JACOBS, Case No. 2:25-cv-2648-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, commenced this action in the Sacramento County Superior Court, alleging that defendants violated his civil rights and California law by failing to provide him adequate medical care. ECF No 1 at 9-17. On September 15, 2025, defendants removed the case to this court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. ECF No. 1; see 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1441(c). Shortly thereafter, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint, seeking to remove all federal claims, together with a motion to remand. ECF Nos. 3 & 4. Defendants have filed a statement of non-opposition to both motions. ECF No. 8. I will grant plaintiff’s motion to amend and recommend that his motion to remand be granted.1 25 26 27 1 Plaintiff has also filed a motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.