Peluso
Allen Hammler v. J. Peluso, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLEN HAMMLER, No. 2:25-cv-03303 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 J. PELUSO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is incarcerated in state prison and proceeding pro se with this civil rights action 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff has not paid the court’s filing fee or requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Typically, the court would provide plaintiff the opportunity to 22 submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. However, a review of court records shows that 23 another judge determined plaintiff was a three-strikes litigant before he filed the complaint in this 24 action on November 13, 2025. See Hammler v. Godfry, No. 1:25-cv-0728 KES-BAM (PC), 2025 25 WL 2391075, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2025), report and recommendation adopted, No. 1:25-cv- 26 0728 KES BAM (PC), 2025 WL 2695561 (E.D.…