Abadi

Olivia Johnson v. Gina Adabi, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20252:25-cv-03403California1,921 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OLIVIA JOHNSON, No. 2:25-cv-03403-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 GINA ADABI, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant 18 to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed 19 in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and a declaration, including a statement of income and expenses, 20 averring she is unable to pay the costs of these proceedings. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The 21 motion to proceed IFP will therefore be granted. However, for the reasons provided below, the 22 Court finds Plaintiff’s complaint is legally deficient and will grant Plaintiff leave to file an 23 amended complaint. 24

I. SCREENING

25 A. Legal Standard 26 The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally 27 “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks 28 1 monetary relief from a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.