Sandoval

Keith Jerome Wright v. Sandoval

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20251:22-cv-01082California1,730 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH JEROME WRIGHT, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01082-JLT-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS

v. (Doc. 38) SANDOVAL, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Keith Jerome Wright is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. BACKGROUND On September 13, 2024, the Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order. (Doc. 28.) On May 7, 2025, Defendant filed a motion to deem Plaintiff’s responses to certain requests for admissions as admitted. (Doc. 31.) On June 6, 2025, when Plaintiff failed to file a timely opposition to the pending motion, the Court issued its Order to Show Cause (OSC) in Writing Why Sanctions Should Not be Imposed for Plaintiff’s Failure to File an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition. (Doc. 32.) Specifically, Plaintiff was directed to file a written response to the OSC within 21 days; alternatively, Plaintiff could comply with the OSC by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.