Sandoval
Keith Jerome Wright v. Sandoval
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEITH JEROME WRIGHT, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01082-JLT-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
13 v. (Doc. 38) 14 SANDOVAL, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Keith Jerome Wright is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 On September 13, 2024, the Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order. (Doc. 28.) 21 On May 7, 2025, Defendant filed a motion to deem Plaintiff’s responses to certain 22 requests for admissions as admitted. (Doc. 31.) 23 On June 6, 2025, when Plaintiff failed to file a timely opposition to the pending motion, 24 the Court issued its Order to Show Cause (OSC) in Writing Why Sanctions Should Not be 25 Imposed for Plaintiff’s Failure to File an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition. (Doc. 32.) 26 Specifically, Plaintiff was directed to file a written response to the OSC within 21 days; 27 alternatively, Plaintiff could comply with the OSC by…