Trate

Travis Sulton v. B. M. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20251:23-cv-00709California881 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRAVIS SULTON, No. 1:23-cv-00709-CDB (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

13 v. DISMISSED FOR PETITIONER’S FAILURE

TO OBEY LOCAL RULES AND FAILURE

14 B. M. TRATE, TO PROSECUTE 15 Respondent. 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE 16 17 18 Petitioner Travis Sulton (“Petitioner”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 20 I. Background 21 Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition on May 8, 2023, while in custody of the Bureau 22 of Prisons (“BOP”) at United States Penitentiary, Atwater. (Doc. 1). On August 20, 2025, the 23 Court completed a preliminary review of the petition under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 24 2254 Cases1. (Doc. 5). Petitioner argues he was denied approximately 270 days of earned time 25 credit that should have been applied to shorten his period of supervised…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.