Moreno

Ramello Randle v. Moreno, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20251:25-cv-00230California403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMELLO RANDLE, No. 1:25-cv-00230-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST

MORENO, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES BEFORE

FILING THE LAWSUIT, AND DIRECTING

Defendants. THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE

CASE

16 (Doc. 12) 17 Plaintiff Ramello Randle is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed a complaint on February 21, 2025, and alleges that Defendants deliberate indifference resulted in poor prison conditions that caused him and his cellmate to have health issues. (Doc. 1). On August 8, 2025, the magistrate judge issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit in compliance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995. (Doc. 11.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.