Moreno

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAMELLO RANDLE, No. 1:25-cv-00230-JLT-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

13 v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST

14 MORENO, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES BEFORE

FILING THE LAWSUIT, AND DIRECTING

15 Defendants. THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE

CASE

16 (Doc. 12) 17 18 Plaintiff Ramello Randle is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 19 this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed a complaint on February 21, 2025, and alleges that 20 Defendants deliberate indifference resulted in poor prison conditions that caused him and his 21 cellmate to have health issues. (Doc. 1). 22 On August 8, 2025, the magistrate judge issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause 23 why this action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to 24 filing suit in compliance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995. (Doc. 11.) …