Charles
Hoa Duc Nguyen v. Marcos Charles, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HOA DUC NGUYEN,
No. 1:25-cv-01592-TLN-CSK Petitioner,
12 v. ORDER 13 MARCOS CHARLES, et al., 14 Respondents.
16 This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Hoa Duc Nguyen’s (“Petitioner”) request for 17 injunctive relief. (ECF No. 1.) Respondents Marcos Charles, Pamela Bondi, Kristi Noem, and 18 Todd Lyons (collectively “Respondents”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 12.) Petitioner replied. 19 (ECF No. 13.) For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED and the Court 20 issues a preliminary injunction.2
Initially, Petitioner filed this action pro se. (ECF No. 1.) Although the Court has since appointed the Federal Defender to represent him (ECF Nos. 9–11), the Court liberally construes Petitioner’s initial pro se filing. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007).
Petitioner requested immediate injunctive relief as a part of his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed November 19, 2025. (ECF No. 1). On November 21, 2025, the Court notified the 25 parties that it construed Petitioner’s…