Rivers

Tomasena Dureeka Rivers v. County of Kern, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20251:25-cv-01684California1,870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMASENA DUREEKA RIVERS, Case No. 1:25-cv-01684-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. (Doc. 2) COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

Defendants. WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED AS TIME-BARRED

16 (Doc. 1) 17 21-DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Tomasena Dureeka Rivers (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on December 1, 2025, against Defendants County of Kern, State of California, Kern County Department of Human Services (“KCDHS”), California Department of Social Services (“CDSS”), KCDHS Director Lito Morillo, Program Director Valerie Rangel, and Appeals Specialist Bethany Wade (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 1). I. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis without prepaying fees or costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). The Court finds Plaintiff has made the showing required 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.