A.S.
A.S. v. Point Quest et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 A.S.,
Plaintiff, No. 2:23-cv-02029-TLN-CSK
13 v. ORDER POINT QUEST et al., 15 Defendants.
17 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Point Quest and Hannah Smith’s (“Smith”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings. (ECF No. 79.) Plaintiff A.S., a minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem Shawn Springer (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 86.) Defendants replied. (ECF No. 92.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion is DENIED. /// /// /// 27 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This action arises out of an incident at an elementary school between a young student and a teacher. The Court previously outlined the factual allegations in this case and incorporates that description here. (See ECF No. 58 at 2–4.) For clarity, the Court briefly reiterates the following: Point Quest is a non-public school for disabled students with special needs that contracts…