Quiring

Rayon Jones v. J. Quiring

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20252:24-cv-01933California1,262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYON JONES, Case No. 2:24-cv-1933-TLN-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER;

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

J.QUIRING, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a motion seeking injunctive relief in the form of a protective order due to death threats plaintiff has received from other inmates. ECF No. 30. Plaintiff has also filed a request to have an in-person settlement conference. ECF No. 33. For the reasons described below, I will deny plaintiff’s later motion and recommend that his motion for injunctive relief be denied. “A preliminary injunction is ‘an extraordinary and drastic remedy, one that should not be granted unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.’” Lopez v. Brewer, 680 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968, 972 (1997) (per curiam)); see also Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.