Schnieder

Roger E. Clark v. Benjamin Denton Schnieder, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20252:25-cv-02929California842 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGER E. CLARK, Case No. 2:25-cv-2929-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER BENJAMIN DENTON SCHNIEDER, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings this section 1983 action against healthcare providers Benjamin Denton Schnieder, Tracy Patterson, and Lori Green at the California Medical Facility (“CMF”). His claims against the defendants are inadequate to proceed past screening and are dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, makes the required showing and is granted. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.