Castillo

Adrian Juan Lloyd v. D. Castillo, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20251:20-cv-00683California1,518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIAN JUAN LLOYD, Case No.: 1:20-cv-00683-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF

DECEMBER 4, 2025

v. (Doc. 85) D. CASTILLO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Adrian Juan Lloyd proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amendment free exercise of religion claims against Defendants Castillo and Anderson. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On April 7, 2025, the Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order. (Doc. 80.) Relevant here, the deadline to amend pleadings was set for July 7, 2025. 23 On November 17, 2025, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Clarification Motion.”1 (Doc. 83.) On November 18, 2025, the Court issued its Order re Plaintiff’s Filing of November 17, 2025. (Doc. 84.) The Court addressed Plaintiff’s inquiry regarding the potential for filing an amended complaint, concluding that “even were the Court inclined…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.