(PC)Purdagone

Roxanne Purdagone v. Officer Greg Rodriguez and Michael Pallares

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20251:23-cv-01324California4,809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROXANNE PURDAGONE, Case No. 1:23-cv-01324-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART

v. DEFENDANT PALLARES’ MOTION TO

DISMISS1

OFFICER GREG RODRIGUEZ and MICHAEL PALLARES, (Doc. No. 21) 15 Defendants. FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE

17 This matter was reassigned to the undersigned on July 3, 2025. (Doc. No. 34). Plaintiff Roxanne Purdagone is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel on her First Amended Complaint alleging violations of civil and constitutional Rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 19, “FAC”). Defendant Michael Pallares filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 21). Plaintiff filed an opposition (Doc. No. 25), and Defendant filed a reply (Doc. No. 26). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends the district court grant in part and deny in part the motion to dismiss. Specifically, 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.