Bravo

Cuong Huy Dao v. M. Bravo, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20251:25-cv-00970California846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CUONG HUY DAO, Case No. 1:25-cv-00970-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFENDANTS A. GUTIERREZ AND M.

v. LOPEZ SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FROM THIS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

M. BRAVO, et al., PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO

EFFECTUATE SERVICE

Defendants.

SIXTY (60) DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff Chong Huy Dao (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive use of force claims against Defendants M. Bravo, J. Rivera, J. Perez, A. Heredia, Devila, Medina, A. Gutierrez, M. Lopez, Rodrigo, and two Unidentified Correctional Officers, and Eighth Amendment medical deliberate indifference claims against Defendants LVN Reyes, RN Callejo, and Dr. Kongara. On September 15, 2025, the Court issued an order directing service on Defendants under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.