Chris Eckhardt v. Dynamic Gaming Solutions, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Chris Eckhardt, No. 2:22-cev-01747-KJM-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. Dynamic Gaming Solutions, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 In a previous order, the court dismissed this action as a sanction for plaintiff Chris Eckhardt’s failure to comply with the court’s orders, including in the preparation of this case for 19 trial. See Prev. Order (Oct. 9, 2025), ECF No. 75. Eckhardt then filed an “ex parte letter brief” 20 requesting review by the Chief Judge of this District. ECF No. 77. The court construes this filing asamotion to alter or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59, as it was 22 filed within 28 days of the judgment.' See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e).

' The court does not construe the motion as a judicial conduct or disability complaint under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980, 28 U.S.C. §§ 351-64. If Eckhardt intended to pursue such a complaint, he is referred to the…