Olsen

Megan Olsen v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20252:22-cv-02294California3,309 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MEGAN OLSEN, No. 2:22-cv-02294-DJC-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER COSTCO WHOLESALE

CORPORATION,

15 Defendant. 16 On August 21, 2025, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 91.) That same day, judgment was entered for Defendant, and this action was closed. (ECF No. 92.) On September 18, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). (ECF No. 103.) That motion is presently before the Court. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s Objections to Defendant’s Bill of Costs and Defendant’s Request to Seal. (See ECF Nos. 96, 106, 108.) For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is denied. The Court declines to permit the taxation of costs. The Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s Request to Seal. //// //// LEGAL STANDARD

Under the Federal Rules of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.