Chad Michael Creel v. Sacramento County Sheriff Department, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHAD MICHAEL CREEL, No. 2:24-cv-01533-KJM-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et al., 14 Defendants.
16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Before the Court is the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 28) filed by Defendant Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department (SCSD). Plaintiff has filed a motion to accept late filings (ECF No. 31) and a motion to e-file (ECF No. 26). The Court held a status conference on the pending motions on November 20, 2025. The Court now recommends DENYING the motion to dismiss. The claims against SCSD have already been dismissed without leave to amend. ECF No. 24. The Court herein addresses Plaintiff’s other pending motions and directs service of the operative complaint on Deputy Titherington. I. Background and Procedural History Plaintiff filed his complaint and…