Robbie Carl Ellington, Jr. v. City of Sacramento, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20252:25-cv-00158California884 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBBIE CARL ELLINGTON, Jr., Case No. 2:25-cv-0158-DC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff,

ORDER; FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss, which is currently set for hearing on December 18, 2025. ECF No. 22. After plaintiff failed to timely respond to that motion, I continued the hearing on defendants’ motion and ordered plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the court’s local rules. ECF No. 24. I also ordered plaintiff file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion by no later than November 26, 2025. Id. I warned plaintiff that failure to comply with that order could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an opposition to defendants’ motion or otherwise responded to the court’s order. The court has the inherent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.