Vilades

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEONARD SCARBROUGH, Case No. 2:25-cv-1214-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE VILADES, et al., Defendants. 16 On September 3, 2025, I screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint and dismissed it for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 11. I ordered plaintiff to file, within thirty days, either an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal of this action. Id. To date, plaintiff has not responded. The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); see Local Rule 110 (“Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.”). A court may dismiss an action based on a party’s failure to…