Mccormick

Sheila McCormick, et al. v. City of Vallejo, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20252:25-cv-01468California511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHEILA MCCORMICK, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-1468-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., Defendants, 16 Defendants have filed motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint, which are currently set for hearing on December 18, 2025. ECF Nos. 15 & 16; see ECF No. 30. On November 14, 2025, the court granted Benjamin Nisenbaum and Katherine MacElhiney’s motion to withdraw as plaintiffs’ attorneys. ECF No. 30. The court also ordered plaintiffs to either file a response to defendants’ motions to dismiss or notify the court that they wish stand by the oppositions filed by their former counsel. ECF No. 30; see ECF Nos. 20 & 21. To date, plaintiffs have not responded to the court’s November 14 order. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.