Ziarah Quincy-Kamazz Broad-Bynum v. Stanislaus County Superior Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZIARAH QUINCY-KAMAZZ BROAD- Case No. 2:25-cv-2085-WBS-JDP (P)

BYNUM,

12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v.

STANISLAUS COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT, Respondent. 17 On August 20, 2025, the court screened the petition and found that it failed to state a 18 claim. The court granted petitioner thirty days to file an amended petition. ECF No. 6. 19 Petitioner did not timely file an amended petition, therefore, on November 13, 2025, the court 20 ordered petitioner to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to state a 21 claim, failure to prosecute, and failure to comply with court orders. ECF No. 11. Petitioner has 22 not responded to the order to show cause, and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, 23 dismissal of the action is warranted. 24 The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that 25 power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty.,

1 Although it appears from the file…