Wellpath

Shawn Arlin Donley v. Wellpath, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20251:23-cv-01740California860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAWN ARLIN DONLEY, No. 1:23-cv-01740-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

v. DEFENDANTS WELLPATH, et al.,

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Monell claims against Wellpath and County of Madera, and deliberate indifference claims against Chief Manuel Perez, Sheriff Tyson Pogue, Sergeant Khela, Sergeant Quick, Corporal Garza, Corporal Townsend, Sergeant Villanuava, Dr. Gustavian, Medina, Debbie, Eva, Michelle, Maria, Chloe, Alejandra, Victoria, Libby, and Jane Doe. (ECF No. 23.) Here, the U.S. Marshal attempted to serve Defendants Alejandra, Chloe, and Libby with the information that Plaintiff provided. However, the Marshal was informed that Defendants Alejandra, Chloe, and Libby are no longer employed by the Madera County Jail and no 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.