Martinez

Anthony Latanziov. Martinez, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20251:24-cv-01352California1,173 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY LATANZIO, Case No. 1:24-cv-01352-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION MARTINEZ, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

Defendants. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO OBEY COURT ORDER

16 (ECF No. 7)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 I. Background Plaintiff Anthony Latanzio (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 28, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it stated a cognizable claim against Defendants Dominguez and Martinez for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment, but failed to state any other cognizable claims for relief against any other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.