Wofford

J.R.M.J. v. Minga Wofford, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20251:25-cv-01567California668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J.R.M.J. , No. 1:25-cv-1567-DC-SCR Petitioner, v. ORDER MINGA WOFFORD, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is proceeding through counsel, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter was referred to the undersigned on November 26, 2025. ECF No. 10. The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254. Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondents will be directed to show cause why the writ should not be granted by filing an answer/return within 20 days from the date of this order. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Petitioner may file a reply/traverse to the answer/return within 14 days after being served a copy of it.

Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.