Cesar Ivan Martinez Ozuna v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility et. al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20251:25-cv-01753California389 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CESAR IVAN MARTINEZ OZUNA, No. 1:25-CV-01753-DC-DMC Petitioner,

ORDER

v. WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY et. al., 15 Respondents.

17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, and motion to appoint counsel, ECF No. 3. Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, makes the required showing and is granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Petitioner’s motion for the appointment of counsel, ECF No. 3, will also be granted. In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the court has determined that the interests of justice require the appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Within seven days of this order, the appointing authority for the Eastern District of 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.