Saribekyan

Marietta Saribekyan, et al. v. Merrick Garland, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20252:24-cv-03091California1,108 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIETTA SARIBEKYAN, et al., No. 2:24-cv-3091-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

MERRICK GARLAND, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs Marietta Saribekyan, Arsen Saribekyan, and David Saribekyan are represented by counsel in this case. This case was assigned to the undersigned under the Court’s automated case assignment plan. See Local Rules, Appendix A, subsection (m). On November 7, 2024, plaintiffs filed a petition for writ of mandamus. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs have taken no further action. On August 21, 2025, the Court issued a minute order, ordering plaintiffs to file a status report updating the Court on the status of this case and ordering plaintiffs to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiffs have not responded to the Court’s order, nor taken any further action to prosecute this case. For the reasons that 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.