Asya Weston v. WIP 800 J Lofts, et. al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ASYA WESTON, No. 2:25-cv-02364-DJC-CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER WIP 800 J LOFTS, et. al., Defendants. 16 Proceeding pro se, plaintiffs Asya Weston and Corinne Marshall initiated this action by filing a complaint. (ECF No. 1.) On December 2, 2025, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint (“TAC”). (ECF No. 28.) Plaintiffs’ request to seal documents is before the court. (ECF Nos. 30, 31.) Plaintiffs have also filed a motion for a twenty-one day extension of time to file a second amended complaint (“SAC”) (ECF No. 26) and a motion for one day extension of time to file the TAC (ECF No. 29). Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file the SAC is DENIED as moot, because the Court already granted leave for plaintiffs to file a TAC (ECF No. 25), and plaintiffs have filed the TAC (ECF No. 28). Furthermore, the Court accepts plaintiffs TAC, and the motion for a one-day extension of time is GRANTED. (ECF No. 29.) …